Least-privilege access
Systems should receive only the access required for a defined responsibility and operating boundary.
Security and governance
Matar’s security model begins with explicit authority, least privilege, human approval boundaries, inspectable evidence, and a defined path to pause or reverse execution.
Systems should receive only the access required for a defined responsibility and operating boundary.
Consequential actions are assigned explicit approval, delegation, and escalation rules.
Roles and permissions are implemented according to the customer system and deployment architecture.
Events, decisions, approvals, exceptions, and evidence requirements are scoped for the workflow.
Use and retain only the data needed for the defined operational objective.
Secrets remain server-side or in approved secret stores and are not exposed to browser code.
Development, test, pilot, and production boundaries are defined for the engagement.
Provider choice does not determine permissions, approval rules, or human authority.
Known failure and ambiguity paths receive owners, evidence requirements, and escalation routes.
Authorized people can pause, redirect, or delegate bounded execution according to the contract.
Health, cost, performance, and intervention metrics are selected for the deployed workflow.
Containment, ownership, evidence preservation, recovery, and customer communication are defined proportionately.
Customer data remains the customer’s; processing rights are limited to the applicable agreement.
Retention and deletion periods depend on the workflow, agreement, law, and customer requirements.
Only verified service providers are published; planned providers are not presented as active subprocessors.
Isolation choices depend on risk, infrastructure, data sensitivity, and the agreed operating model.
Connectors are scoped, authenticated, monitored, and limited to the actions required by the workflow.
Deployment isolation
Architecture, responsibility, access, data location, recovery, and support are agreed for the operation.
Assessed per engagement
Hosting, access, monitoring, and support boundaries are defined in the applicable deployment plan.
Deployment-dependent
May be considered where customer infrastructure, security ownership, and operational access are suitable.
Deployment-dependent
Isolation and connector boundaries are designed around the customer’s systems and data requirements.
Not generally claimed
Feasibility must be assessed; the public site does not represent this as a standard live option.
Trust documentation
Qualified clients can review the security documentation, data processing requirements, active subprocessors, and service commitments relevant to their operating boundary.
Available during qualified discovery
Reviewed per engagement
Public structure available
Defined in the signed agreement
Incident and customer data principles
Customer data remains the customer’s. Processing is limited by the service boundary and applicable agreement.
Retention and deletion are defined around the data, workflow, law, contract, security need, and customer requirement.
Containment, ownership, evidence preservation, recovery, and customer communication are defined proportionately for the deployment.
Active service providers are documented according to their role in the deployed system.